Shekhar Golchha
Senior Vice-President, FNCCI
The economy is set to see almost 7 per cent growth in
more than two-and-a-half decades. The government and political parties have
shown seriousness about the economic agenda. Many foreign and domestic investors
are pouring their money in different sectors. But the private sector is
slightly discouraged as the government has failed to heed the reforms as
suggested by it.
Against this backdrop, Modnath
Dhakal of The Rising Nepal talked
to Shekhar Golchha, senior vice-president of the Federation of Nepalese
Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FNCCI). Golchha, who is also the head of the
largest business house in the country, the Golchha Organisation, has already
been anointed as the next chief of the FNCCI. He spoke his mind on various
economic issues. Excerpts;
How
do you assess the current business environment in the country?
As per my assessment, the current business
environment can be termed as ‘a lost opportunity'. The GDP growth rate has reached
almost 7 per cent after two-and-a-half decades, but we are not prepared to
sustain the economic progress. It needs a better vision and policies to utilise
the opportunities created by the higher economic growth rate. We are over
dependent on remittances, which have contributed to higher consumption and
better revenue collection. Our per capita income has also improved because of the
remittances. The growth rate of remittance is decreasing while incidents
relating to diplomatic tensions in Qatar might have severe repercussions for our
foreign employment, which can put pressure on us. We do not seem to be paying
much attention to all these variables that can directly or indirectly hit the
economy in the future. We need to increase exports, and for that the cost of
doing business should be drastically brought down in order to be competitive in
the international market. Likewise, the spread rate should be narrowed down.
The FNCCI has presented its recommendations to the
government to provide subsidy to export-oriented businesses, and remove the cartels
and syndicates in the transport and other sectors. The cartels have
significantly increased the transport cost. Similarly, non-tariff barriers and
lack of infrastructure are also the reasons behind the poor business
environment in the country. Increasing export and attracting foreign direct
investment (FDI) can be a remedy to the balance-of-payments problem should
remittances fall.
What
exactly should be done to attract FDI?
There are still some hurdles in attracting FDI. The
Foreign Investment Act has just been approved by the Cabinet and may take many
months to get it passed in the Parliament. Many other policies and legal
instruments as well as procedural reforms need to be implemented at the
earliest to facilitate the foreign investors.
The Labour Act and Social Security Act should be
enacted as soon as possible, otherwise the provisions of the Industrial
Enterprise Act, which were approved by the Parliament last year, cannot be
implemented. I have heard that the Social Security Act was okayed by the
Parliamentary Committee recently and Labour Act will also be taken forward as
soon possible. The private sector is hopeful that more policy reforms will be
carried out to improve the business environment.
The
import-export gap is ever increasing while most of the businessmen are shifting
to trade. Has the manufacturing sector lost its charm?
When the government is revenue-oriented and makes
revenue collection its topmost priority, the private sector automatically moves
to trading. The bureaucracy still believes that if the revenue collection
increases, the decision is right else it thinks otherwise. If any government
decision contributes to loss of revenue to any extent, it's not considered to
be a good decision. They think that increased revenue is always in the
'national interest'. We still need many facilities, like subsidy and trade
facilitation, in order to successfully run manufacturing and export-oriented
industries.
Strikes
have almost become a thing of the past, and there is a seamless supply of
electricity. Furthermore, the government is very positive about fulfilling the
demands of the investors and businessmen. Will these developments not have a positive
impact on the economy?
The electricity problem has been solved by 70 per
cent, and for the very reason, industrial productivity has increased by more
than 10 per cent. So we can say that the industrial sector is growing faster
than the national economy. We have been receiving investment commitments from
both domestic and foreign investors in large projects, like hydropower and
cement. Likewise, bank lendings have also increased significantly this year.
Therefore, I believe that the private sector is enthusiastic and hopeful about
the business environment in the country and will invest more. But, there are
certain things that the government should do. We simply lack infrastructure.
Roads are insufficient and are of poor quality, the capacity of the international
airport has been saturated. We have suggested the government to address these
problems in the next fiscal year budget.
The
private sector is unhappy with the budget of the coming fiscal year 2017/18 because,
as you said, it did not incorporate the suggestions given by the business
bodies, such as the FNCCI. What recommendations were not accommodated in the
budget?
As I said earlier, we had recommended to the
government to expedite the construction of infrastructure such as roads,
airports and railways. Similarly, we asked for subsidy for export-oriented
business and trade facilitation, tax reforms, prioritising the energy sector
and many more. There were also many suggestions from the district chambers of
commerce and industry. But due to the election code of conduct, the government
couldn't accommodate our suggestions or announce new policies and programmes.
Here, what I would like to say is that the economic agenda should not be
overshadowed by the country’s politics. The first priority should be the
economy, and it should not be ignored in any situation.
It is high time to develop our infrastructure on a war
footing. The economy should be the main agenda of the government and all the political
parties. Sad to say, the political parties seem to be paying only lip service
to the economic agenda.
The
government was successful in having foreign investors commit about Rs. 1.4
trillion at the Nepal Investment Summit. How much of this will materialise?
The success of the Investment Summit has delivered
two messages: there are many foreigners who want to invest in Nepal, and there
have been positive developments in the country which will make the country even
better in the future. We should take it positively, although it's up to us to realise
the intended money.
What would be the role of private sector
business associations like yours and individual businessmen in realising the
intended investment?
Sometimes, we put the cart before the horse. Without
making significant reforms in policy and process, we must not dream of
attracting large FDI. The new Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act,
and Labour Act are yet to be ready while the environment-related laws are not
investor-friendly. Every foreign investor minutely observes the legal provisions,
including the business registration and exit process of the destination
country. They are concerned about what would happen when they close their
business here and want to move out. We have not done much in this regard. It’s
very inspiring that the foreign investors expressed their intent to invest a
large amount of money in Nepal. I don't want to say that we will fail, but we
must expedite the process to reform the policy and create a better business
environment in order to materialise the intended investment. It's up to us to
realise the amount of money we want to actually bring in. As a co-partner in
organising the summit, we are very positive in this regard and will extend
every possible help to the government.
Some
of the businessmen don't want a foreign rival, especially a large one, in the
business sector. Cement is an example. In such a scenario, how can we believe
that the government will be getting support from the private sector?
I don't think Nepalese businessmen are against FDI.
But we are concerned about the facilities that are provided to a foreign
investor but not to a Nepali one in the same sector. The government should not
favour the foreign investors at the cost of domestic business, and ensure a level
playing field for the Nepali businesses. Some sectors should be protected. The
government has signed BIPPA (Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection
Agreement) with foreign countries, including India. What has it done to protect
domestic investment? We have raised such issues with the government.
The
FNCCI had created a project bank a couple of years ago. Has there been any
progress on selling those projects to investors?
The project bank was very popular, and many domestic
and foreign investors had taken references from it in establishing their businesses.
However, we have not assessed the current status of the project bank’s
implementation.
You
belong to a family that has a long history of association with business,
including trade, manufacturing and service. To what extent has a family
business like yours promoted a corporate culture in Nepal?
As of now, we don't have an alternative but to bring
in a corporate culture in our business. Professional management is the key to
staying aloft in market competition and making a business successful.
Traditional family businesses have been adopting professional management for the
last one-and-a-half decades. As business grows, you have no choice but to
resort to the modern management system.
(Published in The Rising Nepal Daily, June 19, 2017/Asar 5, 2074)