Kathmandu, May 16
The Supreme Court (SC)
has issued an interim order against the government that the law enforcement
officials must behave and cause others to behave respectfully towards every
individual while implementing the customs-related rules at the Nepal-India
border points.
Issuing the order on
Friday, joint bench of justice duo Hari Prasad Phuyal and Tek Prasad Dhungana directed
the Prime Minister's Office, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Finance and
Department of Customs to ensure that the law enforcement official's behaviour
is not against the right to live with dignity as mentioned in the Constitution.
The Ministry of Finance had issued a notice
a year ago to implement the provision to impose customs duty on goods worth
above Rs. 100. The Customs Department had begun strictly enforcing the rule
from April this year.
The petitioners, advocates Amitesh Pandit,
Suyogya Singh, Prashant Bikram Shah and Akash Mahato from DJ Law Associates,
had demanded an interim order directing not to immediately implement or cause
the implementation of the provision.
However, the SC did
not clearly say anything for or against the government's decision to impose
customs duties on goods worth above Rs. 100 brought to Nepal from India via
land routes.
According to the order, except for
controlling the transportation of goods for commercial purposes or the criminal
offence of smuggling, lawful import of medicinal items related to an
individual's health, items of minimal necessity used in social relations, and
minimal commodities purchased for the personal use of local residents of the
border area should be respected.
But the SC said clearly that imposing
customs duty is a sovereign right of the government (State).
It stated that the validity, relevance, and
appropriateness of the limit of Rs. 100 specified by the MoF by publishing a
notice in the Nepal Gazette exercising the power conferred by the law, will be
considered during the full hearing of the petition.
In their petition, the advocates had
demanded appropriate orders including mandamus and prohibition not to create
any hindrance or obstruction in bringing daily and monthly food supplies
through the border checkpoints, to grant full exemption on any obstruction or
duty on goods carried while travelling for marriage or visiting relatives, and
to implement strict monitoring for smugglers.
Similarly, the petitioners argued that while
individuals travelling by air are granted exemptions to bring one mobile phone
handset, 25 grams of gold, and even a 32-inch television, and while at the Chinese
Tibetan border points, exemptions are granted to bring goods through the
checkpoints simply by verifying citizenship, it is evident that the government has
discriminated people residing at the southern border.
Stating that the century old relations
between Nepal and India has transformed the specific border regions into a
distinct kind of Semi-Integrated Socio-Economic Zone, the petition maintained
that for the people, the market across the border is of their own village, the
hospital across the border is the health post of their own neighbourhood, and
the relatives across the border are members of their own household.
Published in The Rising Nepal daily on 17 May 2026.
No comments:
Post a Comment