Kathmandu, Feb. 3:
Chief of the Local Level Restructuring Commission (LLRC), Balananda Poudel,
Friday argued that the government had no right to review the number of local
bodies the LLRC had fixed.
"The Commission
has even compromised on its earlier decision to create 565 local bodies to
accommodate the demand of the political parties,” LLRC chairman Poudel said at
an interaction on 'Local level restructuring and media’. “From the perspective
of capacity, most of the local bodies will be weak. The country needs lesser
number of local bodies."
Poudel also expressed
his belief that the government would not return the report on restructuring the
local bodies, which the Commission submitted to the government last month.
He said that about 80
per cent of restructuring the local bodies, including special and autonomous
areas, had been completed.
"The Commission
has almost completed its duties except for determining the number and
boundaries of special, protected and autonomous regions and some other
proposals," he said.
However, the LLRC is
yet to offer recommendations to the government on the division of power and
resources among the federal, provincial and local levels as well as village
council, municipality and district assembly.
Likewise, work is
underway to prepare proposals on the required administrative structure and
human resources at the local level, appropriate framework of local services and
integrated and coordinated development framework for the Kathmandu Valley and
the capital city.
The LLRC has only 40
days to complete all these tasks as its tenure will be over on March 13 this
year.
There are less
chances of extending the time for the job since the constitution has allowed
only a year to the Commission to complete the task of restructuring the local
bodies and recommend to the government on various issues related to
restructuring.
Poudel said that the
areas and communities that were socially and economically backward, poor and
remote would be recommended to be declared as special regions while absolute
minority, endangered and marginalised ethnicities, communities and cultural
areas would be protected regions, and areas that had a dense presence of a
single ethnicity, community, language and culture would be defined as
autonomous regions.
Local governance
expert Krishna Prasad Sapkota said that the local government should be strong
as per its jurisdiction to address the concerns of the people and provide
services.
He said that any step
to defer the local election would be regression.
The programme was organised by Development Communication Society (SODEC) Nepal.
The programme was organised by Development Communication Society (SODEC) Nepal.
No comments:
Post a Comment