Kathmandu, Feb. 23: A member of the
Eminent Persons’ Group (EPG) and Indian professor Mahendra P. Lama said that Nepal
lost the game in energy cooperation with India and China.
“In both India’s ‘Act East Policy’
and China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ initiative, energy is a core content. Nepal
started well, but somewhere it lost the track,” Professor Lama said while
delivering a lecture on ‘India and Nepal in the 21st Century:
Aspirations and Challenges’ organised by the Institute of Integrated
Development Studies (IIDS).
The founding vice-chancellor of the
Sikkim University said as Nepal lost the track in tapping the energy potential,
the standard track became that of “don’t do it yourself and don’t let others do
it.”
According to him, both ways Nepal
lost the game and undermined its unparalleled comparative edge.
However, he pointed towards a
better future as Nepal-India-China energy tri-junction has gradually emerged as
a crucial geographical area for cross-border energy exchanges.
“Besides the politico-historical
participation of India and China in the development of Nepal’s hydro power
resources, there are several factors that are likely to trigger a vibrant
energy exchanges among these countries,” he said.
He urged the governments of both three
countries to put the people-to-people level relations at top slot and the
government-to-government level relations at the bottom spot.
“However, the very nature of state
formation, foreign policy orientation and governance structure and power
echelons on both sides of the border somehow put the government-to-government
relations at the top spot,” he said.
“I feel this overwhelming
domination of governments underplaying and even neglecting the other three core
interactive terrains invariably creates some sort of awkward situation that is
known as bilateral chicaneries and imbroglios.”
He said that historically
Nepal-India relations had been firmly established in four distinct interactive
terrains – at the people-to-people level, civil society level, business-commercial
level and government-to-government level.
According to him, India and Nepal
should rethink and renegotiate their relationship and let the people-to-people
institution lead the relationship along with civil society level and
business-commercial level interaction, and let the government to government
deliberations, negotiations and operational details are carried out to
facilitate and consolidate the role of these three core actors.
He suggested India, Nepal and other
South Asian countries to sign a convention to collectively work on the issues
of migration outside the SAARC region to protect each others’ migrant
community, coordinate a collective position on immigration policies of the
destination countries, collective bargaining with the developed market
economies and other labour importing countries on making labour market more
liberal, check human smuggling and irregular migrants and even provide skills
to potential migrants.
Published in The Rising Nepal on 24 January 2018.
No comments:
Post a Comment